Ryzom

Stand and Deliver!!

uhuhu wrote:Stand and Deliver!!

ironic... how can audrey post on a thread talking about friends...
if you dont have something constructive to say dont post.

kye m8 !!!! ganker

uhuhu wrote:kye m8 !!!! ganker

OOC: Do not derail this thread please.

uhuhu wrote:kye m8 !!!! ganker

lol, lets put our hands up who has been ganked by audrey, calling me a ganker is just stupid nearly everyone on this server see's yourself as a trouble maker, shall i bring some old thread links up to remind you audrey?

it was the past kye... i dun kill peeps w/o reasons now

uhuhu wrote:it was the past kye... i dun kill peeps w/o reasons now

I'm interested now... what kind of reasons? Any examples?

Let's keep this civil, please.

(all IC)

With so few outposts up for grabs, even neutral outposts should be attacked once in a while.

A guilds neutrality doesn't give it a life long lease on the outpost they possess.

Also, no-one feels the benefit of an outpost better than the owners, regardless of trading.




Thomas

varelse wrote:*I'm really tired of the term "neutral" and would like to see it retired in favor of some more relevant terms. Call them rogue, unbeliever, independant, non faction, opportunist, free thinker... something besides "neutral"!

OOC: Yep, agree about the word "Neutral".

We have some lovely lore and history with slavery, bribes corruption wars, Fyros, Kami, Karavan, Matis, Tryker, Zorai; all great background and story that we can riff off.

Many guilds and players have beautiful back-stories and interesting ideas but when the game mechanics don't support them they have to play with what is available.

With only three words assigned to use (Kami, Karavan, Neutral) how can they cover the spectrum of views, feelings, aims and ideals? It is a very poor language that only has three words. We have to do what happens in the real world; supposing someone is called "Smith" or "Schmidt" we don't decide how they react form their name, we judge them by their actions, what they say and do.