Page 2 of 16

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:28 pm
by ambika
catfud wrote:If the guild is that good enough to hold the post when its not the holidays they would be good enough to easily take it back after the holidays are over :p

True...there is the defense stage. However, it's still bloody rude and low. -_-; And annoying... :p

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:31 pm
by catfud
ambika wrote:However, it's still bloody rude and low. -_-; And annoying... :p
A bit like making fake declares...


...but on a positive note chocolate eclairs are sooo good mmmmm

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:32 pm
by riveit
I agree the Christmas day and Eve attacks were lame. Maybe the devs could disallow attacks on certain holidays.

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:35 pm
by ambika
catfud wrote:A bit like making fake declares...


...but on a positive note chocolate eclairs are sooo good mmmmm

Duh. :p I'm not for false declarations.

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:37 pm
by kostika
riveit wrote:There was a dev post already saying that such behavior would be considered an exploit and would be monitored carefully by them. I haven't found it yet though.

Find me the post and I'll believe that. If a GM comes to me and says its an exploit, I'll stop. Sorry but I never read such a thing and I have been keeping close track of the op forum posts.

This isn't the real world.

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:39 pm
by final60
kostika wrote:Find me the post and I'll believe that and stop. Sorry but I never read such a thing and I have been keeping close track of the op forum posts.

This isn't the real world.
Isn't it obvious to you that this behaviour is exploiting?

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:41 pm
by kostika
final60 wrote:Isn't it obvious to you that this behaviour is exploiting?

Making an alt guild to do this would be an exploit. Creating a roleplaying situation with another guild for mutual protection, no.

Aggro dragging and kill stealing are against the rules but that doesn't stop you or others from doing it.

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:42 pm
by final60
kostika wrote:Making an alt guild to do this would be an exploit. Creating a roleplaying situation with another guild for mutual protection, no.
Whats Rp about faulse declaring war over and over? It would be more RP to fight for the outpost no?

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:44 pm
by final60
This post is on behalf of Jayla:

"maybe its time for the nub guilds to step aside and let the big boys play".

lol

Re: Faulse Declarations? o.0

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:44 pm
by ambika
kostika wrote:Making an alt guild to do this would be an exploit. Creating a roleplaying situation with another guild for mutual protection, no.

Aggro dragging and kill stealing are against the rules but that doesn't stop you or others from doing it.

Same stuff. You're still using the "declaration war" to stop other guilds from attacking your OP when it should be do-able.

And aggro-draggning and kill stealing don't have any direct connection to this argument because it IS stated that it's against the rules. We are just discussing if it is an exploit or not. [edited in] Actually you're just saying that people still do it even if it's against the rules...meaning if it was against the rules to declare war and not attack, people would still do it. But it can be more easily regulated I think. [/edited in}Currently, I have not read either if it is or isn't. But I'm willing to bet it may just be since OPs are meant to be attacked and defended. Just me 2 cent.

final60 wrote:This post is on behalf of Jayla:

"maybe its time for the nub guilds to step aside and let the big boys play".

lol

lol I think I like her. :p