Page 2 of 2
Re: Compared to Asheron's Call...
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 4:16 pm
by bgrifter
Stringing paperclips and spinning pennies was more enjoyable than Asheron's Call. Ryzom is the clear winner there for the "doesn't make me want to gouge my eyes out with an ice pick from boredom" effect.
Re: Compared to Asheron's Call...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 5:26 pm
by xixan
AC2 is crap...
AC1, other than graphics, beats the crap out of all other MMORPG's.
Re: Compared to Asheron's Call...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 5:38 pm
by bgrifter
Unregistered wrote:remove the few hundred useless npcs around fairhaven and il start agreeing with ya, going to town is frickin nasty on your pc, it goes so damn slow (ryzom)
Honestly I haven't really had any problems with that in Zora. My PC is decent but not exactly high end (Athlon XP 2000, 512mb RAM, 128mb GeForce4 MX-440) and for the most part the game has run fairly smoothly with all graphics settings turned up at 1280x1024. There are definitely some issues with server lag, but I seem to be ok on graphic lag.
Wish I could pinpoint what i'm doing differently, because i've heard complaints from people with similar or superior machines about graphic lag. I am running Win2k rather than WinXP or something, could possibly be part of it.
Re: Compared to Asheron's Call...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:14 pm
by raul75
vladww wrote:Comparing AC2 to Ryzom is like comparing a rabbit with an elephant.
Apart from long involving quests ( coming soon ) Ryzom has more features after 2 weeks release than AC2 will ever have.
Is it me or all support for ryzom has the words, "coming soon" "seems" "in the future" "eventually" "wait"