Page 2 of 4
Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:49 pm
by rdfall
don't go telling me we couldn't have killed u tyrisha, as easy as it was the first time it would have been equally easy the second time, 2 spells down, period.
Machieltje, I find that if you post such a thing about people you don't know you should look in the mirror when you say that, just common sense. I find that post offensive on my side, and i'm sure you'd feel the same.
Jyudas, i never said i didn't like whining, that's mach's interpretation, if somebody complains about being killed, you don't go flood that thread with comments on how useless pvp is. There's tons of other threads to do that in, just post a link if you want to those if you want to complain. I'll have pvp in the region I want, which happens to be the FvF zone, since it is my goal to make sure the karavan will NOT construct their temple, that goal cannot be reached by fighting fighters, only by making it so that they cannot harvest.
Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:05 pm
by roninpvp
rdfall wrote: u don't like pvp? Then don't go to the zone, this is an off topic post and belongs in the other naysayer threads.
Techinically talking about getting killed in Majestic Garden before you even port to the FvF Zone in AD cause your taking advantage of a bug to hurt other players...the bug being guards not respawning.
Hmmm wait theres a word for intentionlly using bug in game play to your advantage ....exploit!

Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:13 pm
by rdfall
wait... we killed the guards minutes before, and... why would that be an FvF zone if you weren't supposed to be allowed to kill eachother too?
Oh and, what bug? nobody ever told me they're supposed to spawn, i didn't see the Pyr ones spawn yet either
Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:28 pm
by kazaam31
well my opinion is.. the war is great.. and thats the opinion of many high skilled ppl cause we´re getting bored by time.. nothing to do

Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:36 pm
by rdfall
finally, a constructive post, thanks its, been a while since i've seen those

lol
Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:43 pm
by morzyr
rdfall wrote:don't go telling me we couldn't have killed u tyrisha, as easy as it was the first time it would have been equally easy the second time, 2 spells down, period.
I see.. you failed to see the meaning of my post.
Ofc you killed me and maybe you had used a spell or 2 more if i had my proper gear on but and the outcome does not matter really as i would not have attacked you.
What i meant was the words you used, "Left me alive" as you was some kind of great force or godlike creature what controlls the destany of players.
This how i understand things happend with bit of tvist....
Some kids did take you candy so you went off with your friends and toke some one else kid candy then beat the pulp out of the poor bystander granny and her dog.
Totaly moraly normal i understand.
Don't worry i won't take revenge on you for missunderstanding the rules of war.

Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:47 pm
by rdfall
I see it more like this personally:
2 factions are at war, faction X and faction Y to make it easy
-Faction X kills the guards of a camp of Faction Y and kills a few bystanders that happen to have a symbol of Faction Y over their heads
-In a response Faction Y kills the guards of a camp of Faction X and a few bystanders that happen to have a symbol of Faction X over their heads
Never played strategy games? If the enemy hits you the general course of action would be to hit back. The other course of action would be u don't hit back, which means the enemy weakened you and he stays equally strong.
wouldn't be too smart to go for option 2 in a war

Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:49 pm
by roninpvp
rdfall wrote:If the enemy hits you the general course of action would be to hit back.
You should read more carefully

She's a pacifist

Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:52 pm
by rdfall
that why she had that symbol over her head? if ppl have that symbol they are an enemy or a potentional enemy, if they knew that would save them the karavan would come rushing in shouting they were pacifists, then suddenly attack and kill us all.
That's called a suprise attack, you ever played strategy Sinful?
Re: A sad player:(
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:56 pm
by grimjim
rdfall wrote:that why she had that symbol over her head? if ppl have that symbol they are an enemy or a potentional enemy, if they knew that would save them the karavan would come rushing in shouting they were pacifists, then suddenly attack and kill us all.
That's called a suprise attack, you ever played strategy Sinful?
If people have that symbol over their head it is because some mysterious invisible force has decided that they should, regardless - necessarily - of their own personal views or choice.
As it is, the current setup doesn't give the pacifists, neutrals, Trytonists, hominists or a lot of other types any way to interact other than to stomach a type of play and an RP direction they don't like.
And its not a choice since if you don't take part you're going to miss out on a great deal and get left behind.