Ryzom

vguerin wrote: ***Edited: Insulting other users and use of foul language is not permitted on these public message boards. Please take a moment to read through our forum rules & Netiquette ***

This is a post about foragers exhanging ideas and digging techniques so that we may all benefit from our collective knowledge.

If a forager shows me a way to dig more than 17-18 mats per pull...I CARE.

If a forager was pulling 15 mats and is now pulling 18 from something they learned in this post...I CARE, and I bet they do too!

So I really don't understand your bitterness DT.

As for ***Removed: Foul language ****...we get along with the community just fine, it's mostly the thugs and bullies that don't like us much, and I'm ok with that.

G3 spd, h6 rate, q250, terrain spec and mat spec, sometimes absorb source damage, cp 200

16 x 3, and max qual at 9 mats q24x at 8 mats. ideal for chatty diggers who forget to care, still get decent qual if no care, power to socialise a bit more freely while digging is worth it imo.

Thanks for sharing your extraction settings. But it would make a little morer sense if you would post your prospecting settings too.

I d like to dig 3x16 but have to admit that i dont know how. Is a rite needed to dig the 3rd spot ?

Use the higher prospection for multiple source stanza you can. The higher this stanza is, the longer the sources stay.

vguerin wrote: ***Edited: Insulting other users and use of foul language is not permitted on these public message boards. Please take a moment to read through our forum rules & Netiquette ***

Errrmmmm??

a) What brought that on? (Not that I actually CARE why you're being abusive)

b) If you haven't got a constructive comment, please don't bother posting your abuse.

c) Was it really necessary for you to ***Edited: Insulting other users and use of foul language is not permitted on these public message boards. Please take a moment to read through our forum rules & Netiquette *** with that abuse? You don't do anything but make yourself look bad with that kind of comment.


*walks away shaking head and pointing to the last line of Saranda's sig*

benjouu wrote:Use the higher prospection for multiple source stanza you can. The higher this stanza is, the longer the sources stay.

For the three spots digging you need the multiple source stanza you get at lvl 200.

At least it works out with three spots if you do the prospecting without time bonus in your settings.

Carfesch

schlo01 wrote:For the three spots digging you need the multiple source stanza you get at lvl 200.

At least it works out with three spots if you do the prospecting without time bonus in your settings.

Carfesch

Ah, "without time bonus" are the magic words . I will check and see what works best for me.

micrix wrote:Ah, "without time bonus" are the magic words . I will check and see what works best for me.

you can get 3 with bonus time 1, (and the extra time rite). just need to be quick =)
oh like most i get 3x16/17 using the 2 stage appoach in pr and 3x16-21 (and occasional dp) above ground by using agressive speed 6 on the second stage of action.
Manage focus by using a lower q on the first stage - 50 below region level in pr and q150 above ground. means that first stage of extract fits in a 145 brick

philu wrote: c) Was it really necessary for you to ***Edited: Insulting other users and use of foul language is not permitted on these public message boards. Please take a moment to read through our forum rules & Netiquette *** with that abuse?

WHAT??!!

What foul language??!! Funny but I thought you were English Lawrence, or at least spoke it! The phrase I used means to interrupt.

See here for a definition of the phrase.

And kindly don't accuse me of something that isn't true!

Hmm, was that edited because of the Butt or the ****list bit?

I'd be pretty disapponinted if it was the former, since it's not profane in any way, and is used both as slang and also as genuine English. For example, "Cigarette Butt".

I'd be willing to give Lawrence the benefit of the doubt here, and go for the word you both used with one * in it. If I'm wrong, someone needs some serious adjustment to their censorship rules.

Have to say I'm disappointed with that post DT, I appreciate you have issues with ON (and likewise), but there really wasn't any need...

EDIT: Fairly sure it was the word with the *, the other posts have been edited too... it wasn't you at fault philu