sydius wrote:Yes. I would say it is also.
ummm it's rather simple and direct, a webpage should NOT be difficult or cluttered. the nevrax.org site is rather nicely done, a good exmaple of a bad website is microsoft's website. and yes i do realize the irony of that but it's not because i hate m$, it's because their site is a pain to naviagate, i use google's site:microsoft.com <search string> to find stuff on their website cause it's easier
actually you'd be surprised how many would switch over. i've seen several that would switch to a linux client. sides i'm sure slashdot would post it on their mainpage, which would garner more players and more exposure for the gametetra wrote: Use the tool best for the job, in the case of games, it is almost always windows. To be brutally honest, I would be rather pissed if nevrax wasted the dev time needed to port the client over to linux, instead of spending that money on something that would actually effect the game in a positive way. The number of folks who would not play the game if they could not play it in windows, is such a tiny fractional minority, that it's not even a statistical blip.
so them not developing a linux port is something that would make them more money. i'd be rather annoyed if they didn't make a client for it.
yes you are correct, tho only an open source client would only benefit tho the platform the client is made for. but opensource as a general rule will do nothing but help a product.trosky wrote: Windows is not the best tool for the job. Its the most used tool for the job. Even the Windows user would benefit from having a Linux client :
1- The Linux mmorpg players might be very interested in Ryzom = more players
2- Open Source means people at home can iron out bugs in the client, those bugs could also be present in the Windows version.
3- It also means they can improve the performance of the client, and again the Windows user could benifit from that.
4- It would give more visibility to Ryzom = more players again
Im no computer programmer, my personnal experience with open source is DeviceNet (open source automation technology). So this might be a little biased... feel free to correct me if im wrong in my statements.