I may as well disagree with those posts, too; I would have preferred a less aggressive approach where, in context, one devoted "Jenaite" expresses his discomfort for seeing supposedly allied faction *homins* helping faction enemies, thus developing complex politics, as I said, and alternative approaches, thus developing and impacting the saga, where different views clash... or even no posts at all and keep them in game.aude03 wrote:We didnt invent the words Kamivan, Fake karavan, check all the threads about outpost and/or faction, you'll find several of them linked to Nexus guild, and look at who are the posters too...
But maybe some are allowed to do that, and others are not.
But being in a bipolar setting as we are, these disagreements will pop, and they may not be garnished with IC words, but have fundamentally the same meaning.
Outposts are meant to be fought over, as much as some (including myself) may be disappointed by this. Conflicts, tensions, and other feelings will raise. Managing an outpost means that one needs to be, at least, aware of this (take the heat), or, put it simple, give away your op and enjoy the other aspects of the game.
Taken to the limit, now imagine all ops are peacefullly taken, owners owning ops only in their own lands... what about the rest? as much as they are "shared", I'd rather be in an owning position than in a begging one.
PS: And finally, Geniastrid, please do not consider this personal at all, IG I am mostly a carebear... but the OPs feature is lacking in a lot of aspects and creating tensions for a lot of players, not only including owners.
