Do you need more storage space?

[acridiel]

Ehm, WASN´t storage space allready upped not so long ago?

And IF it is again upped?

Will you whine again a few month later????

WHERE will this stop?

1Million Slots/Packer/GH/App./Bag????
2 Million?
10 Million????


Sorry guys, but this is ridiculus..

Acridiel

[thebax]

Ehm, WASN´t storage space allready upped not so long ago?

And IF it is again upped?

Will you whine again a few month later????

WHERE will this stop?

1Million Slots/Packer/GH/App./Bag????
2 Million?
10 Million????


Sorry guys, but this is ridiculus..

Acridiel

I have plenty of slots, had plenty before the patch gave us more. What I want is more bulk space, the inventory slots mean little.

[keoni]

I think between our GH and all our alts, the ON packrats have six or seven GH's worth of stuff. So....yesh! Being able to buy "warehouse" upgrades to GH's would be a particularly nice addition to the game, and seems like it would be a relatively simple feature to implement.

[sofiaoak]

At the moment I don't need more storage.

I have 3 packers, all almost empty and apartment what is totally empty.

[alibasil]

Im kinda with acridiel... the only reason why slots isnt really an issue now is because all mats will now stack into groups of 999.

I think extra space should be available but it should be rented space that comes at a price according to your highest level

[hugedan]

I dont need any more slots personally, but then i keep my items to a minimum also i have not gone in to the mining or manufacturing scene yet fully. Although i think i probably would need them in the near future.

[savvy]

As I said before not all players need more space but from the votes so far most want the option for more space. The issue is not the slots as much as it is the bulk. GH slots can easily be filled up but I have plenty of slots left in my bag, packers, mount and apartment.

What I am suggesting is *optional* purchasable upgrades to the existing inventory (even if it is just bulk upgrades) as well as a the ability to purchase storage lockers in place of packers. You get extra space at not only the cost of dappers but the cost of losing a packer. Just because you don't need extra space (acridiel) doesn't mean the idea is ridiculous.

I do not like the idea of renting additional space, I think you should be able to purchase the additional space outright. If it had to be rented most would just continue to use the merchants to store mats.

[hans1976]

I would like to buy either more then one appartment (like one in each capital) and/or multiple guildhall (linked together by the now inactive doors) also one in each capitol.

And while we are at it, can the GH access be revamped so we can give access on a member to member basis?

I agree with the packer suggestion...

[XoloX]

Of course we'd all like to see more bulk on our already available storage.
But wouldn't that take any need for evaluation out of the way we use to really store things? Everybody, hunters and diggers at the first place, would just stack up on any kind of loot or material until they're packed all up again...
The way it is now can be frustrating for harvesters and/or crafters yet it forces us to think what to really keep an what not.

What I'd really like to see is a way to deal with the NPC merchant's towering misuse as temp storage. For me, it is far more infuriating to browse through what a (material) merchant has up for sale just to see that none of it is actually really up for sale...
*dreams of a punitive tariff duty for resale retrieval to remove the first 20% of resale storing and a non-refundable sales commission paid upon entering any items to remove a further 30% of it*
*also envisions the introduction of the possibility to own three packers per continent and begins to plan a parking lot business in PR and snickers*

[iphdrunk]

Well, I tend to say "yes, I want more room/space/bulk" but... in my case, I'd suffer the "Hard Disk effect": no matter how big my hard disk is, I end up filling it. since the first 20M ones to today standards...