PvP, the devil: or (to P or not to P?)

Come in, pull up a chair, let's discuss all things Ryzom-related.
Post Reply
User avatar
vinnyq
Posts: 1311
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 12:05 am

PvP, the devil: or (to P or not to P?)

Post by vinnyq »

So you think PvP is evil eh?

Well lemme tell you this, some of the best games in life are PvP! Heck the first popular video game was PvP (Pong).

Thru all ages, games that are competitive, where mind and might match up with other mind and might for a healthy dose of competition, bring out the best (and worst in some cases) of players and gamers. We have Chess, Risk, Checkers, Card Games, Monopoly! We have Dune 2, Command and Conquer, Warcraft, StarCraft! We have Counterstrike, Unreal Tournament, Battle Field 1942, Halo! We have NFL, NBA, World Cups, the Olympics!

True, some play for bragging rights and ego stroking, but the best of them play for pure entertainment and the joy of game and competition, because what is more fun, to match your mind, reflex, and strength against a human opponent, or a computer?

Why are games like StarCraft, Warcraft, and FPS like Counterstrike, Quake and UT remains on people play list long after the game predicted lifespan? The PvP factor (and modding, but we won't get into that here :P ).

So PvP, in it's purest form of competition and entertainment, is gold, and keep your gaming fresh and exciting and random and unpredictable. If you can accept competition and that you win some, you lose some, and just have fun with it, then you will.

It's not about my pixel beating up your pixel, it's about may the best man (or woman!) win. PvP in itself is not the devil. Only part of it, the ugly players, are what made it so. Ignore these and enjoy the healthy competition bit, and your gaming experience will transcend way beyond what PvE can ever do for you.

This is my belief, and I am sticking to it.

Thank you for your time.

(please don't KOS me *meep*)
Last edited by vinnyq on Wed May 25, 2005 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fyrx, Fyros
raynes
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:00 am

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by raynes »

I think many of the people who are afraid of pvp think it's always the person with the biggest toys wins. That is not the case in this game. And it REALLY isn't the case with outposts. Strategy is where the winning is at.
Ryzom English Wiki: http://ryzom.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Help create a complete resource of Ryzom!
User avatar
vinnyq
Posts: 1311
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 12:05 am

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by vinnyq »

hale, even without outposts, just team vs team battle in the arena or pr, there can be strategy.
Fyrx, Fyros
User avatar
geezas
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:10 pm

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by geezas »

In my expriance pvp is major fun if you can let go of your fear if being killed. And don't give anything about the loss of your own characters life.
(I played AO/UT that's about all my pvp experiance comes from)

Running around with 12 other people in a instagib deathmatch is something everybody should try once and see if they still don't like pvp *ZAPP* *SPLAT* :D

Snaring everybody (even your own side by accident) can get you some new words for the foul language collection :p Trying to kill a much superior adversairy with 4 people and still beating the dust every time :( But that is war, somebody is alway's stronger and better organised or equiped and 1 must win) Sniping off wounded and stuck people was low and fun at the same time. *evil grin*

One thing that botherd me was the hatred and insulting name-calling caused by pvp.
Aina - homin
Evolution
Oh lookie a thingy, that would go very well with this thingy I have here and the other thingy I found at the uhm thingy near uhm well, that's not important right now. This might make a excellent thingy to hit thingies with :D
User avatar
sehracii
Posts: 1185
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:00 am

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by sehracii »

raynes wrote:I think many of the people who are afraid of pvp think it's always the person with the biggest toys wins. That is not the case in this game. And it REALLY isn't the case with outposts. Strategy is where the winning is at.

I think that is a key point. I've stayed clear of most PvP (aside from some friendly duels) so far in this game because my fight levels aren't really anything to brag about (highest 135 Defensive Affliction) and I'm sure there are a lot of people that feel the same way. They don't want to get in a fight where they'll lose just because they didn't spend enough time leveling melee or elemental.

I am wholeheartedly looking forward to outposts though, but only on the belief that there will be proper implementation on how they run, are attacked, and defended. If a guild full of AoD's can just run out and take over any outpost held by a less combat oriented guild, it will be severely disappointing. I truly hope the aspect of "strategy" you mention runs deep in the system.
Sehraci Antodera [Medium Armor & Accessories Boutique]
Master of Illusion and Torment
"True power is not destruction, but control"

Karavaneer - Arispotle
Reapers of the Dark
User avatar
geezas
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:10 pm

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by geezas »

sehracii wrote: If a guild full of AoD's can just run out and take over any outpost held by a less combat oriented guild, it will be severely disappointing. I truly hope the aspect of "strategy" you mention runs deep in the system.
Hoping with you but I do not have high hopes.
Aina - homin
Evolution
Oh lookie a thingy, that would go very well with this thingy I have here and the other thingy I found at the uhm thingy near uhm well, that's not important right now. This might make a excellent thingy to hit thingies with :D
raynes
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:00 am

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by raynes »

sehracii wrote:I think that is a key point. I've stayed clear of most PvP (aside from some friendly duels) so far in this game because my fight levels aren't really anything to brag about (highest 135 Defensive Affliction) and I'm sure there are a lot of people that feel the same way. They don't want to get in a fight where they'll lose just because they didn't spend enough time leveling melee or elemental.

I am wholeheartedly looking forward to outposts though, but only on the belief that there will be proper implementation on how they run, are attacked, and defended. If a guild full of AoD's can just run out and take over any outpost held by a less combat oriented guild, it will be severely disappointing. I truly hope the aspect of "strategy" you mention runs deep in the system.
I can tell you that the type of players that make of the guild won't make that big of a difference (if any at all). What will matter is what type of NPC's you hire, what combination you have, how you group them to send them to protect your outpost, and when you send them to attack. An outpost will be successfully defended if you use your troops in the best way.
Ryzom English Wiki: http://ryzom.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Help create a complete resource of Ryzom!
User avatar
grimjim
Posts: 2784
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:00 am

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by grimjim »

You're wrong.

And I shall now explain why :)

Context.

Roleplaying games are non-competetive games.

Their very genesis comes from cooperative play, a shift in paradigm from the wargames that gave them birth.

In a conventional RPG the Game Master is there to provide an interesting series of challenges and a good cooperative story. Not to wipe out the players. (Though some never understand this...).

What fun would it be to pit your first level adventurers against a great dragon right off the bat because the GM is in a vindictive mood?

None.

Roleplaying games, even your most basic dungeon crawl, rely on cooperation. The wizard to discern the magic, the fighter to hold the creatures at bay, the cleric to heal and the thief to open locks and disarm traps.

That, primitive, mode of D&D play is _still_ the basis for just about every MMORPG in existence.

Computer games come the other way. Computer games have often been adversarial or scorekeeping, you play to beat something, yet in one player computer games the trick is to make something challenging, not impossible. The game designer is out to intrigue, challenge and hook their audience, not to frustrate them (which these bloody race missions on San Andreas are doing to me at the moment :P )

In Pong players are equal, they have the same size bat, its down to their reflexes and skill, nothing else. Their bat is just a bat, it has no history, no emotional investment in its existence.

Chess pieces don't have personalities and histories.

Risk, Chackers, card games, FPS shooters, everything you mention is NOT an RPG, not on the RPG model of play and, thusly, is entirely irrelevent.

That was always what was refreshing about RPGs, that you got together for a common goal, to have fun, you weren't competing to be the best. The only exceptions to this are, really, Paranoia and Vampire: The Masquerade/Requiem LARPs. In Paranoia the infighting is played for laughs, characters are disposable ciphers and dying is pretty much the point of the game.

Context.

In VTM/R LARPs there is a certain amount of satisfaction to be gained from backstabbing your rivals, getting them killed etc, but this can come down to political skill and innate charm as much as what's on your character sheet, keeping it half a step removed from the PvP in MMORPGs. However, it still causes massive problems. Players gang up to kill an NPC just fine with no arguments, player versus player? Then the arguments start about rules, justifications, lies, cheating, it never ends and it destroys everyone's fun.

You mention pitting your wits against a human opponent being more satisfying, I agree, but that's only really true in 'twitch' games like FPS. In an MMO its more like a trial of endurance, who has spent the most time levelling their character. Unless they're almost exactly on par in levels there is LITTLE to no unpredictability or skill in who wins. Even luck plays a very minor role.

Until we get an MMORPG that moves away from levels and hit point bloat as a mechanism of advancement that's always going to be the way. There's no involvement there, not even who can click attack the fastest.

PvP _IS_ the devil. It makes enemies of friends, spoils people's enjoyment, interrupts their fantasies and takes a large and unwelcome bowel movement in their fun.

How would you feel if you were playing, say, KOTOR and you approach the final scene to face Darth Whats-his-name when suddenly some ubered up dark jedi player runs past you, slaughters your entire party, calls you a 'n00b' and then sprints on chuckling madly. It would totally interrupt and spoil the play experience.

Everyone playing Ryzom is the hero of their own story and PvP knocks that for six.

I can see a limited place for PvP in resolving sections of the story arcs, so long as there can be clear winners and losers. Otherwise PvP is just a way for 1337 kiddies to get their kicks because they haven't discovered girls yet.
--
Jyudas
High Officer in the Samsara
WEALTH & GLORY!
Currently pondering R2, please hold...
We're neutral, you're just too cheap to hire us.
Remember, other people exist than yourself.
User avatar
quasar11
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 4:32 pm

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by quasar11 »

grimjim wrote:You're wrong.

And I shall now explain why :)

Context.

Roleplaying games are non-competetive games.

Their very genesis comes from cooperative play, a shift in paradigm from the wargames that gave them birth.

In a conventional RPG the Game Master is there to provide an interesting series of challenges and a good cooperative story. Not to wipe out the players. (Though some never understand this...).

What fun would it be to pit your first level adventurers against a great dragon right off the bat because the GM is in a vindictive mood?

None.

Roleplaying games, even your most basic dungeon crawl, rely on cooperation. The wizard to discern the magic, the fighter to hold the creatures at bay, the cleric to heal and the thief to open locks and disarm traps.

That, primitive, mode of D&D play is _still_ the basis for just about every MMORPG in existence.

Computer games come the other way. Computer games have often been adversarial or scorekeeping, you play to beat something, yet in one player computer games the trick is to make something challenging, not impossible. The game designer is out to intrigue, challenge and hook their audience, not to frustrate them (which these bloody race missions on San Andreas are doing to me at the moment :P )

In Pong players are equal, they have the same size bat, its down to their reflexes and skill, nothing else. Their bat is just a bat, it has no history, no emotional investment in its existence.

Chess pieces don't have personalities and histories.

Risk, Chackers, card games, FPS shooters, everything you mention is NOT an RPG, not on the RPG model of play and, thusly, is entirely irrelevent.

That was always what was refreshing about RPGs, that you got together for a common goal, to have fun, you weren't competing to be the best. The only exceptions to this are, really, Paranoia and Vampire: The Masquerade/Requiem LARPs. In Paranoia the infighting is played for laughs, characters are disposable ciphers and dying is pretty much the point of the game.

Context.

In VTM/R LARPs there is a certain amount of satisfaction to be gained from backstabbing your rivals, getting them killed etc, but this can come down to political skill and innate charm as much as what's on your character sheet, keeping it half a step removed from the PvP in MMORPGs. However, it still causes massive problems. Players gang up to kill an NPC just fine with no arguments, player versus player? Then the arguments start about rules, justifications, lies, cheating, it never ends and it destroys everyone's fun.

You mention pitting your wits against a human opponent being more satisfying, I agree, but that's only really true in 'twitch' games like FPS. In an MMO its more like a trial of endurance, who has spent the most time levelling their character. Unless they're almost exactly on par in levels there is LITTLE to no unpredictability or skill in who wins. Even luck plays a very minor role.

Until we get an MMORPG that moves away from levels and hit point bloat as a mechanism of advancement that's always going to be the way. There's no involvement there, not even who can click attack the fastest.

PvP _IS_ the devil. It makes enemies of friends, spoils people's enjoyment, interrupts their fantasies and takes a large and unwelcome bowel movement in their fun.

How would you feel if you were playing, say, KOTOR and you approach the final scene to face Darth Whats-his-name when suddenly some ubered up dark jedi player runs past you, slaughters your entire party, calls you a 'n00b' and then sprints on chuckling madly. It would totally interrupt and spoil the play experience.

Everyone playing Ryzom is the hero of their own story and PvP knocks that for six.

I can see a limited place for PvP in resolving sections of the story arcs, so long as there can be clear winners and losers. Otherwise PvP is just a way for 1337 kiddies to get their kicks because they haven't discovered girls yet.

Nuff said... kudos
Xelir
Heavy Swordsman/Master of Pain/Impaler/Priest


Officer
Ballistix Mystixhttp://www.ballisticmystix.com/index.jsp
"Sorry, it was eyeballin' me"
User avatar
basicart
Posts: 859
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:58 am

Re: PvP, the devil

Post by basicart »

wish ya would stop quoting masive speaches then adding just 3 worrds :D
Post Reply

Return to “General”